May 27, 2004
Edition

Volume 79, No. 9


Ruralite Cafe: Published 05/27/04

By Lynn Hotaling - Editor


 

Research confirms prof’s choice of dog

After reading the first sentence,  “Here’s one professor whose research truly has gone to the dogs,” I was hooked. Not only did I devour every word of the news release about Western Carolina University psychology professor Hal Herzog, I wanted to find out more.

Herzog, it seems, had been wondering why people choose the types of dogs they select for pets. I wondered why it occurred to him to wonder and how he went about finding out.

Working with colleagues at University College London and the University of California-Davis, Herzog examined American Kennel Club records of more than 40 million purebred puppies registered in the United States over the past 50 years.

He learned that people pick dogs not on the basis of reason or because a given breed makes a good pet. It’s more a matter of what’s trendy.

When asked what made him think of studying the topic, Herzog said he’d been studying the psychological and cultural aspects of human-animal interactions for 25 years.

He’s done research on diverse related topics including cockfighting, why people become animal rights activists, ethical issues faced by veterinarians, and the decision process of ethics committees that oversee animal research, he said.

When he stumbled on the American Kennel Club Web site that had the registration statistics for two years, he noticed that Dalmatian registrations were declining.

“I called a friend who is a Dalmatian breeder and is on the AKC board,” Herzog said. “She helped me negotiate with the organization to get all the purebred registrations for the past 50 years – nearly 50 million dogs!”

Herzog has not met either of his collaborators – Matt Hahn, a quantitative geneticist at UC-Davis, and Alex Bentley, a London archeologist. But he had seen a paper the two wrote on cultural drift and changes in the popularity of names people give their kids.

“I realized their mathematical models might apply to the patterns that I was seeing in the dog breeds,” he said. “I e-mailed Matt, and he agreed the dog data looked good.”

The two then got in touch with Bentley. The result, according to Herzog, was a great collaboration.

“They had the math skills and theoretical framework to look at mechanisms that fuel cultural change,” he said. “And I had the great AKC data set.”

The results of the study were published in the April issue of the Royal Society’s Biology Letters, a scientific journal in Great Britain.

According to Herzog, dogs were first selected for domestication to help with hunting or herding. Because most people no longer require dogs that work, usefulness has become less desirable than style.

“Dogs become popular through the same mechanisms that impel, say, wearing baseball caps brim-backward,” he said. “A person selecting a pet dog seems to be highly influenced by choices being made by others at about the same time, without his or her knowing it. In this respect, dog breed popularity is no different than changing tastes in food – remember fondue pots? – clothing styles or music. They have become fads.”

Certain breeds can experience sudden shifts in popularity that can sometimes be traced to a single event, like the rise in popularity of Dalmatians after the Disney movie 101 Dalmatians, Herzog said.

“More often, however, there is no apparent single cause of swings in popularity, such as the booms that occurred in Doberman pinschers, chow chows and Saint Bernards. The popularity of some breeds can just take off, much like a social epidemic.”

Herzog said he and his colleagues have proven that most shifts in dog breed popularity in the United States are due to “random drift,” a process in which individuals copy other people’s choices. As a result, many breeds become popular just by chance. Similar studies have linked random drift to other cultural trends, including popular baby names and designs on ancient pottery.

What are the current most popular dogs? The most popular breed in 2003 was the Labrador retriever, followed by the golden retriever, German shepherd and beagle. Breeds increasing in numbers include the Havanese, cavalier King Charles spaniel, Brussels griffon and French bulldog, while the Dalmatian, chow chow, rottweiler, Akita and Pekinese are declining.

Herzog said the biggest surprise to him is that massive changes in breed popularity can occur very quickly. Old English sheepdogs increased 10,000 percent in about a dozen years, and they can fall just as quickly, he said. Dog breeds have become fashion and show evidence of “behavioral contagion,” he said.

According to Herzog, there has never been a similar study with dog breeds because his group was the first to put the AKC data into a computerized form that could be looked at systematically, though there are studies that have looked at other types of cultural changes using similar mathematical models.

Herzog especially enjoyed the interdisciplinary nature of the research project – the fact that a psychologist, geneticist and archaeologist could work together to examine one topic.

“It raised my thinking about the relationship between biology, sociology and psychology and the ways they can come together,” he said.

He also credits the Internet with helping their effort succeed.

“With e-mail we have virtually instant communication,” he said. “It’s not really necessary to meet.”

Their next project? A look at the geography of dog breed popularity.

What kind of dog resides with the Herzog family? America’s popular choice – a Labrador, a fact that did not surprise Herzog at all.

“Labs are great dogs: They’re good with kids, even-tempered, smart and playful – and they have low-maintenance coats.”


* Articles may take up to 8 weeks to appear in search results provided by GoogleTM
Site Contents Copyright © 2004 The Sylva Herald Unless otherwise noted.
Usage of site signifies acceptance of
disclaimer.
Need to report a problem? Comments/Suggestions?
Click here.